Most recent updates: July 26, 2016

This Week's PSB Survey
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement,* which was shared with me recently by a regular site visitor (who in this case has asked to remain anonymous)? –

*The following quotation isn't verbatim, but instead somewhat shortened and rephrased by me. But the bulk and gist of it comes from the site visitor who wrote to me about it and then granted permission for me to use his comments for this poll. Of course, please keep in mind that your own vote is also anonymous—unless of course you choose to reveal how you voted by identifying yourself and talking about it in the "Comments" section of the "Current Results" page.

"While the latest Pet Shop Boys albums produced by Stuart Price (Electric and Super) have been highly proficient, enjoyable, and even exciting, they seem to lack something—perhaps it's something akin to depth—that would give them 'legs.' After an initial infatuation, I've quickly grown tired of them and feel little desire to go back and listen to them time and time again, the way I do with other PSB albums. Older PSB albums, even those as recent as Fundamental and Yes, have a more timeless quality that makes them endlessly enjoyable. Maybe it's too soon to tell, but I think the latest albums are lacking this."

I strongly agree
I agree
I have very mixed feelings about this
I disagree
I strongly disagree
I have no feelings about this one way or the other
Current Results            Powered by Sparklit

What This Website Is All About

This website has no "official" connection to the Pet Shop Boys. It merely presents my own personal commentary—often including attempted explanations and interpretations—on the songs of my favorite contemporary pop band. Of course, this commentary has often been influenced by what the Pet Shop Boys themselves, Neil Tennant and Chris Lowe, have said about their music and by what others have previously written. Nevertheless, many of the observations I make here are original with me.

By no means am I suggesting that these are the "only" or "correct" interpretations. In fact, it's typical of great art, even great pop art, to lend itself to multiple interpretations. And I do consider the Pet Shop Boys to be the creators of great pop art. So you can take or leave my interpretations as you wish. If you disagree, please don't take offense. Rather, enjoy the fact that we're both fans of music rich enough to invite different interpretations.

Despite my best efforts, I have no doubt that I'm guilty of at least some factual errors. I recognize this fact and apologize in advance for any that may have slipped past me. I'll certainly correct any errors that come to my attention.


This website will be most attractive and legible when viewed on a full screen at a resolution of at least 1024 x 768 pixels. But resolution much higher than that may result in the text being too small for your reading comfort; if you find that to be the case, you may wish to use your browser's zoom-in capabilities. In addition, this site makes extensive use of javascript; if your browser program isn't configured to use javascript or activescript, some features will not work properly.

This site was originally posted on March 16, 2001, and was most recently revised on July 26, 2016.

Honored by Yahoo! as a "Pick of the Week" (April 9, 2001)
and a "2001 Pick of the Year" (December 31, 2001)

Rock on the Wild SideWayne StuderWayne Studer is the author of Rock on the Wild Side (1994: Leyland Publications).



  In Association with Amazon.com

Golden Web Award Winner

Number of home page hits since March 16, 2001: